In a 7-0 decision announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that a legal dispute between a Boardman family and the Ohio Edison electric company over the proximity of two structures on the couple’s property to the company’s overhead power lines must be resolved through the local courts, rather than through a complaint proceeding before the state public utilities commission.
The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that a provision in the state’s disorderly conduct statute, R.C. 2917.11(A)(2), that prohibits “recklessly causing inconvenience, annoyance or alarm to another by ... making excessive noise” provides sufficient notice for a person of ordinary intelligence to understand what the law requires, and therefore is not unconstitutionally vague.
The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that its 2010 decision in State v. Bodyke, which invalidated part of the Ohio Adam Walsh Act (AWA) as unconstitutional, did not invalidate the statutory petition process by which a sex offender may seek judicial review of his classification.
For an immediate response during our normal business hours (Monday-Friday 9:00 am - 5:30 pm) please call the office today at (513) 737-4347. After hours, please fill out the form below, and we will contact you as soon possible.
The materials contained on this website are provided for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal or other professional advice. The operation of this site is not intended to create, and will not create, an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires a consideration of multiple factors including possible conflicts of interest. No electronic communication with our office, on its own, will either form an attorney-client relationship. or instigate an obligation on our part to respond. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established.
